Dispensationalism
By Daniel Pentimone
February 13, 2009
Contents: Dispensational Theology – Notable Dispensationalists – Types of Dispensationalism – Problems with Dispensationalism – Bibliography
Dispensational Theology
| The seven dispensations | |
| Innocence | Gen. 1:1-3:7 |
| Conscience | Gen. 3:8-8:22 |
| Human Government | Gen. 9:1-11:32 |
| Promise (or Patriarchal Rule) | Gen. 12:1-Ex. 19:25 |
| Law | Ex. 20:1-Act. 2:4 |
| Grace | Act. 2:4-Rev. 20:3 |
| Kingdom | Rev. 20:4-20:6 |
Dispensations
The term ‘dispensationalism’ derives from the term ‘dispensations’. Dispensationalists believe that history can be divided up into a number of different ‘dispensation’ periods. A dispensation is defined as ‘a period of time during which man is tested with respect to obedience to some specific revelation of the will of God.’
Dispensationalists differ as to the number of dispensations found in history. The most common view, however, is that there are seven of these periods. These dispensations are listed in the table on the right.
Salvation and the Gospel
Dispensationalists believe, in essence, that there are different plans of salvation at different times. This is based in part on the belief in different dispensations. The dispensationalist may say that salvation always has the same basic elements in it, but different elements are emphasized more at different periods in history.
Just as there are distinctions between different dispensations, so there are also distinctions between different gospels. Most dispensationalists would say that there are four:
- Gospel of the kingdom – they believe that this gospel, which was declared to the Jews by Jesus and his disciples, is the news of an earthly, thousand year reign by Jesus – that is, this gospel is the good news of the millennium.
- Gospel of the grace of God – they believe that this is the news of Christ’s death, burial, and resurrection, declared by Paul.
- Everlasting gospel – the good news that those who are saved during the tribulation, after the church has already been raptured, will still enter the millennium.
- ‘My gospel’ – a full development of the gospel of the grace of Christ and the apostles, spoken of by Paul.
The Kingdom
Dispensationalists believe that there are two different kingdoms, the kingdom of heaven and the kingdom of God. The kingdom of heaven is perceived as the millennium, when Christ himself will reign on earth from Jerusalem and rule the entire world for a thousand years. This kingdom is primarily a Jewish kingdom, and is based on promises to revive the Jewish line of kings. The kingdom of God, on the other hand, is taken to refer to God’s kingdoms in general.
Israel and the Church
A major focus in modern-day dispensationalism is the distinction between ethnic Israel and the church. Although there is some controversy about it, some dispensationalists believe that the church was a sort of afterthought, a parenthesis in history. Most dispensationalists would propose that the church began at Pentecost, and consists of those saved between Pentecost and the future rapture. It is distinct from Israel, though many dispensationalists would allow for ‘dual membership’ – Peter, John, and some others were part of both Israel and the church.
Dispensationalists base this belief on several arguments. They would go to Matthew 16:18, where Jesus could be referring to the church as future; they may propose that the church would not have begun until Pentecost because there was no spiritual baptism until then; they might suggest that Christ became the head of the church because of his resurrection. Dispensationalists could also go to Ephesians 2:20, noting that the church is built upon the foundation of the prophets and the apostles. Finally, this belief is based on the argument that spiritual gifts, which are associated with the church, were not given until after Christ’s resurrection.
Dispensational theology theorizes that the term ‘Israel’ in the New Testament normally refers to all ethnic Jews. Israel is regarded as a special nation chosen by God for blessing. Although Israel has not obeyed God, it is still important to God and will one day be brought back to its promised glory, during the time of the millennium.
Because of their belief in a distinction between Israel and the church, dispensationalists suppose that only part of scripture contains doctrines applicable for the Church. Other scriptures were written with respect to Israel and are applicable only to Israel. Additionally, they believe that one must always remember when a certain covenant or promise is made and apply it only to that covenant or promise.
Eschatology
Most dispensationalists hold to pre-millennialism and a pre-tribulation rapture. Pre-millennialism refers to Christ second coming as occurring before the millennium, a thousand-year, earthly kingdom ruled by Jesus, when he sits on the throne in Jerusalem. Pre-tribulation rapture refers to the rapture of the saints before the tribulation. Dispensationalists generally believe in the following events occurring in this order:
- Whenever a Christian dies, he must go before the Judgment Seat of Christ to receive his rewards.
- Christ returns for his saints and raptures them.
- The tribulation rages for seven years, during which time the antichrist reigns.
- The battle of Armageddon is fought and the antichrist is defeated.
- Christ returns with his saints and sets up the millennium.
- Satan, bound during the millennium, is unbound for a short time.
- The last judgment, also known as the Great White Throne Judgment, occurs. This is specifically for nonbelievers.
- Finally, all believers enter heaven and live there with God throughout all eternity.
Notable Dispensationalists
John Nelson Darby
Known as the ‘father’ of dispensationalism, Darby was born in London on March 3, 1801. Darby studied law to become a lawyer but latter decided to join the official (Anglican) Church of Ireland, beginning in 1825 as a deacon. A year later, in 1826, Darby had advanced to the position of priest. At this point he began to minister among the poor Roman Catholic peasants in his parish in eastern Ireland. For some time Darby experienced a measure of success, but this came to an end when an archbishop over him began to require converts to swear alliance to the English king as lawful king of Ireland (though the English had conquered Ireland hundreds of years earlier, the Irish have remained hostile the English). Darby resigned because of the incident.
It was at this point that Darby began to formulate his dispensational theology. Without an established church behind him, Darby joined an interdenominational group of believers, and for about five years formulated what is now called ‘dispensationalism.’ The interdenominational group later became the Plymouth Brethren ‘denomination,’ of which George Mueller and Jim Elliot were a part. However, not all Plymouth Brethren members held to dispensationalism. In his later years, Darby traveled throughout the world spreading his dispensationalist views. He died on April 29, 1882.
Cyrus Ingerson Scofield
Cyrus Ingerson Scofield, more often referred to as C. I. Scofield, was born on August 19, 1843, in Lenawee County, Michigan. Scofield served with the 7th Tennessee Infantry (Confederate) for a year in the Civil War; he was admitted to the Kansas bar in 1869 and was elected to the Kansas legislature as a Republican in 1871 and 1872; he was also appointed US attorney for the district of Kansas. However, Scofield was forced to resign from the office of attorney due to questionable financial transactions. Shortly afterwards he was jailed for forgery. It appears that he also had a problem with alcohol during this time and abandoned his wife and two daughters.
In 1879 Scofield converted and 1883 married Hettie Hall von Wartz. He assisted Moody for a short time and also became a dispensationalist. He began to serve as secretary of the American Home Missionary Society of Texas and Louisiana, and 1890 he founded the Lake Charles College in Louisiana.
Scofield became a leader in dispensationalism as he was the author of the pamphlet ‘Rightly Dividing the Word of Truth.’ He also wrote the notes for the Scofield Reference Bible which was published in 1909 and influenced many in the direction of dispensationalism. In 1914 Scofield founded the Philadelphia School of the Bible (now known as the Philadelphia Biblical University). Scofield was now a popular speaker even though his health declined steadily. He died on July 24, 1921.
Lewis Sperry Chafer
Founder of one of the most important dispensational seminaries, Chafer was born in Rock Creek, Ohio, on February 27, 1871. After attending Oberlin College, Chafer became an evangelist in Massachusetts and was mentored by Scofield. He taught Bible and Music at Mount Hermon School for Boys between 1906 and 1910, aided Scofield in establishing the Philadelphia School of the Bible, and served as general secretary of the Central American Mission between 1923 and 1925.
In 1921, Chafer began preparing to give his greatest gift to dispensationalism. Scofield was dead and Chafer was called on to fill the vacant pastorate left by Scofield in the First Congregational Church of Dallas. Chafer moved to Dallas and in 1924, with the aid of William Henry Griffeth Thomas, founded the Evangelical Theological College. Today it is known as the Dallas Theological Seminary and is the flagship dispensational seminary.
Chafer served as president and professor of Systematic Theology from the time that he founded the institution until his death on August 22, 1952. Some of his students included Jim Rayburn, founder of Young Life; Ken Taylor, author of The Living Bible translation; and J. Dwight Pentecost, author of Things to Come.
Types of Dispensationalism
Classical Dispensationalism
Classical Dispensationalism was prominent from the 1850s through the 1940s. It is directly based on the writings of John Darby, Lewis Chafer, and C. I. Scofield. In particular, the notes in the original Scofield Reference Bible provide a good picture of Classical Dispensationalism. Since all three major figures in dispensationalism held to Classical Dispensationalism, it could very well be considered ‘pure’ dispensationalism. This form of dispensationalism places emphasis on the belief that the church is nothing more than a parenthesis in history.
Revised or Modified Dispensationalism
Revised Dispensationalism increased in popularity as Classical Dispensationalism decreased. Some would assign it the ‘date’ of 1950s-1985, while others would say that Revised Dispensationalism is still the most common dispensational view. Modified dispensationalists focus on the theorized distinction between the church and Israel. They would also emphasize the belief that the church is a parenthesis in history. As such, the church is basically God’s ‘backup plan’ since Israel would not obey. However, the focus will still, eventually, go back to Israel.
Progressive Dispensationalism
Relatively recently, since about 1986, certain dispensational theologians have proposed a new idea – the church is not a parenthesis but a vital link in history between the dispensation of law and the dispensation of the kingdom. Additionally, progressive dispensationalists acquire their name from the theory that God is progressively fulfilling many different covenants; for example, the covenants made during the dispensation of grace are even now being fulfilled. That does not mean, however, that they will be completely fulfilled during this present dispensation. Progressive dispensationalists agree with other dispensationalists – the covenants made throughout history will not be fulfilled until the dispensation of grace.
Hyperdispensationalism or Moderate Ultradispensationalism
Hypderdispensationalism is, and always has been, a minority view among dispensationalists. In essence, moderate ultradispensationalists believe that the church did not begin at Pentecost but rather began somewhere between Acts 9 and Acts 15, when Paul began his ministry. This view leads them to three significant conclusions: first, the church at Pentecost is not the same church as today and is not, therefore, part of ‘his [Christ’s] body.’ Second, none of the twelve original disciples were part of the church, and therefore they are not part of ‘his body.’ Finally, even less of the scripture is applicable to the modern-day church.
Ultradispensationalism or Extreme Ultradispensationalism
Ultradispensationalism, also known as Extreme Ultradispensationalism to separate it from Moderate Ultradispensationalism, holds to the belief that the Christian church did not begin until the end of Acts, specifically in Acts 28:28. Based on this view, ultradispensationalists will go so far as to draw a chronological line between Paul’s epistles, saying that Romans, 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians, Galatians, 1 Thessalonians, 2 Thessalonians, and (some would say) Hebrews were written before Acts 28:28 and therefore are not applicable to the modern church. However, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy, Titus, Philemon, and (others would say) Hebrews are applicable because they were written after Acts 28:28. These applicable scriptures are known as the ‘prison epistles’ and proclaim ‘the mystery.’
Problems with Dispensationalism
The Root
Dispensationalism teaches that there are different dispensations, and that salvation is essentially achieved in different ways at different times. This is similar to the liberal view that there are many ways of salvation. Dispensationalists would say that there is only one way of salvation, but it has different forms at different times, and requires different acts of obedience at different times. For example, a dispensationalist may propose that the doctrine found in James is not reconcilable to the doctrine found in Romans because James is meant for Jewish Christians while Romans is meant for the Church in the dispensation of grace. In this way God may be viewed as changeable. Additionally, especially among those who view the church as a parenthesis, it often seems as though some dispensationalists perceive God as creating a plan, being thwarted by ungodly men, and then proposing a new ‘backup’ plan.
As one man aptly summarized it, “…What is wrong with dispensationalism? Well, the bottom line is, a wrong view of God.”
Major Arguments[1]
Following are several major arguments against Dispensationalism:
- Divisions – Dispensationalists seem to have the problem of always wanting to divide scripture up and neatly package it in theological boxes. Unfortunately, they go too far and make many divisions where there are none. Most dispensationalists, for example, believe in 7 dispensations, 4 gospels, 2 kingdoms, 6 distinct periods in the dispensation of the kingdom, different forms of salvation at different times, and certain parts of scripture as only applicable at certain times. Dispensationalists would go to 2 Timothy 2:15 to find Biblical support for their divisions: “Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.” However, it is unlikely that someone who is given the Bible without a background in dispensational theology will be able to come up with all of these divisions and distinctions.
- Changeable God – Dispensationalism teaches that there are different plans of salvation, though not necessarily different ways of salvation, at different times. It also teaches that there are changing covenants and changing requirements for salvation. This rejects the Biblical view that God does not change.
- Church History – Although a few theologians in earlier times divided history up, dispensationalism as a system was not around until John Darby ‘invented’ it. Even those who did divide history up did not do it in the same way that dispensationalists do it.
Other Arguments
- Israel and the Church – ‘Church’ means gathering or assembly, and that term is used relatively frequently in the Old Testament, indicating that there was a ‘church’ distinct from ethnic Israel. This is also spoken of in Acts 7:38.
- Profitable for Doctrine – Paul said that “all scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness” (2 Timothy 3:16). However, Dispensationalism teaches that only parts of scripture have doctrine for the church today.
- Kingdoms – The terms ‘kingdom of God’ and ‘kingdom of heaven,’ considered distinct kingdoms to the Dispensationalist, are actually interchangeable terms (compare Matthew 4:17 with Mark 1:14-15; Matthew 10:7 with Luke 9:2; Matthew 19:23-24 with Mark 10:23-24)
- Literality – Most dispensationalists will say that it is important to always take the Bible literally, but will themselves make many things figurative, such as prophecies that they think relate to the Millennium, the seven churches of Revelation that are thought of as seven periods in church history, etc.
- The Olive Tree – Dispensationalists believe that the Gentiles are not Israel and do not even share in the same covenant. However, in Romans 11 the tree which the branches are grafted into is the same tree that the Israelites were grafted out of. This means that the covenant has not changed, nor has there been a shift between Israel and the Church.
- The Israel of God – In Galatians 3:28 Paul states emphatically that there is neither Jew nor Greek. Then in Galatians 6:15-16 Paul says that there is neither circumcision nor uncircumcision. He then goes on to bless ‘the Israel of God.’ If there is neither circumcision, uncircumcision, Jew, nor Greek, then who is the Israel of God? It must be all saved believers, the church. Therefore Israel is the same as the church.
- Judgment Seat – Dispensationalists are careful to delineate between the judgment seat of Christ and the great white throne judgment. They believe that at the great white throne, unbelievers will be tried and found guilty. Believers, however, go before the judgment seat of Christ to be rewarded. Dispensationalists are careful to maintain that believers are not judged at the judgment seat. The scripture says “For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ,” as opposed to “For we must all be judged before the judgment seat of Christ.” If Christians are not judged at it, and if unbelievers do not appear before it, why is it called the judgment seat of Christ?
Bibliography
http://www.theologicalstudies.org/dispen.html, Accessed February 12, 2009. This site contributed abundantly to the discussion of the types of dispensationalism.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dispensationalist_theology, Accessed February 12, 2009. This page listed many of the arguments mentioned in this paper against dispensationalism.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dispensationalism, Accessed February 13, 2009
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultradispensationalism, Accessed February 13, 2009
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewis_Chafer, Accessed February 13, 2009
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyrus_Scofield, Accessed February 13, 2009
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Nelson_Darby, Accessed February 13, 2009
http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=1210314018, Accessed February 10, 2009. Some of the structure of this paper and much of the information on Dispensational Theology is from this.
Note: an excellent article that refutes dispensationalism is ‘Dispensationalism Justifies the Crucifixion’ by Philip Mauro, which can be found at the following address: http://www.reformedtruth.co.za/dispensationalism.aspx
[1] See the red note at the end of this paper for an excellent argument against dispensationalism.